Your Fourth Amendment Rights and Probable Cause

No Comments »

Under the Fourth Amendment, the police can’t search you or seize your property without probable cause. Probable cause is commonly defined as a reasonable belief that a person has committed a crime.

Probable cause typically falls into four categories: observation, expertise, information and circumstantial evidence. Police can look at the totality of the circumstances in determining whether they have probable cause. For example, it is perfectly legal to possess plastic baggies, a digital scale, large sums of cash and multiple cell phones. However, if you are pulled over for a valid traffic stop, such as a suspected DUI, and police see all of these items in your vehicle, they could determine that they have probable cause for a search, because these items are indicative of drug trafficking.

You can unwittingly provide the police with probable cause against you. Acting nervous, giving evasive answers or conflicting statements can trigger probable cause when combined with other evidence. The best thing to do is to politely but assertively  tell the police officer that you do not consent to a search and that you would like to speak with an attorney. In addition, tell him that you assert your right to remain silent and will not answer any questions without your attorney present.

Under the Fourth Amendment, these are magic words that cut off the police officers right to question you. Make no mistake, if you are in a situation where a police officer is asking you questions, you are a suspect and you are under investigation. Do not make the incredibly common mistake of incriminating yourself!

Drug Arrests Are Not All Equal

No Comments »

California is known for a liberal policy on drugs and drug possession, but that is not always the case. Many drug possession cases are charged as felonies. And when it comes to selling, growing, manufacturing or transporting drugs, the penalties are massive.

Fortunately, under Health & Safety Code 11350, drug diversion is an option for many cases that involve only drug possession.

In cases involving the alleged sale of drugs, much of the case will hinge on the question of whether the prosecution can show “intent to sell,” which is difficult to prove, absent a sting operation. When a suspect is arrested, California police look for evidence of intent to sell. Such evidence might include:

  • Relatively large quantity of drug(s)
  • Large amounts of cash
  • Weapons
  • Plastic baggies or other separate containers
  • Multiple cellular phones
  • Text messages
  • Scales
  • Precursor materials
  • Lab equipment
  • Fertilizer, pots, soil

This evidence can be aggressively challenged. After a thorough investigation, we often find that California police:

  • make mistakes, exaggerate or lie in their police reports
  • make arrests despite lacking solid evidence
  • violate suspects Constitution right to be protected from illegal searches and seizures
  • obtain warrants based on faulty or trumped up evidence
  • violate California law against entrapment
  • make use of “informants” of dubious reliability
The key in drug cases is to chop away at the evidence and assumptions one by one. There is much that can be done to get your case dismissed. For example, often it turns out that the police illegally searched you. When that’s the case, your attorney can make a suppression motion and ask the court to show out the illegally obtained evidence. If the judge agrees, your case will likely be thrown out thanks to the motion to suppress.

Top Complaint Lawyers Receive: Attorney-Client Communication

No Comments »

What bothers clients more than anything? Not keeping them in the loop. From a client’s point of view, no amount of expertise or legal talent outweighs their need to be informed. A major part of providing strong assistance of counsel is providing clear communication. In fact, frequent and clear attorney-client communication is crucial to running a successful law practice.

Lack of attorney-client communication is the most common complaint made against lawyers. There is no good reason to let this happen. There are more options than ever before allowing attorneys to keep in touch with their clients. Phone. E-mail. Text messaging. Fax. Snail mail and much more.

Yes, clients want to win their cases, that’s a given. But while they may understand that not every case can be won, they won’t accept that their matter doesn’t deserve your attention. If you fail to maintain the proper amount of attorney-client communication, clients may assume that you aren’t actually doing anything at all.

So what are some good ways to keep clients in the loop?

  • Write case memos and send them to clients as their case progresses
  • Notify clients when adding a court date to your calendar, so they can add it to theirs
  • Promptly return phone calls, e-mails and other electronic communication
  • Scan or copy case files, and share them with the client
  • Consider setting up a digital file system that allows clients to access their file and review it

Taking a few simple steps to keep your client engaged can make a massive difference in your practice. Not only will you have happier clients, but they will be more likely to bring facts to your attention that will help you win the case.

Why Assistance of Counsel is So Important

1 Comment »

According to the Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution:

“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.” (Sixth Amendment ratified December 15, 1791.)

The founding fathers believed that it was so important for everyone accused of a crime to have assistance of counsel, that they actually included it in the Sixth Amendment. The reason for that is that we have an adversarial system. The adversarial system is a legal system where represent parties represented by separate advocates who argue their positions before an impartial jury or judge, who are asked to determine the truth of the case based on the facts, law and reason. The adversarial system depends upon both sides having a competent attorney arguing on their behalf.

This means that the prosecution on the other side will be fighting as hard as they can to make sure that you receive the maximum penalty for any crime that you are accused of committing. However, with a strong advocate on your side, you will have someone to challenge the prosecution and make sure that justice is served in your case. By challenging the prosecutions position, you may be able to get your case dismissed, work out a favorable plea bargain, or be acquitted at trial.

What is a Motion to Suppress?

No Comments »

A police officer cannot arrest you, search you or your property, or seize your property unless he has probable cause to do so. Probable cause is generally defined as “facts or evidence that would make a reasonable person believe that a crime or wrongdoing has been, is being, or will be committed.”

A suppression motion is a legal tactic used in criminal defense cases that generally will question whether the arresting officer had probable cause to make a traffic stop or an arrest and seize evidence against you. The suppression hearing is an opportunity for both sides to argue their positions on the motion to suppress to the judge. The judge will consider both the argument of the distract attorney, as well as the defense attorney, and ultimately make a decision as to whether the evidence in the case should be excluded.

If after analyzing the police report and other evidence obtained by our private investigator in preparation for your case, we determine that the police illegally obtained evidence against you, we will file a motion to suppress the evidence, known in California as a 1538.5 motion. The court will then schedule a suppression hearing for your case.

At the suppression hearing, we will contend that the judge must dismiss the evidence against you as a penalty for the police violating your constitutional rights. For a motion to suppress to be granted by the judge, we must prove that the search and/or seizure was illegal by a preponderance of the evidence. If the suppression motion is successful, the prosecution will be left with no evidence against you, and your case will almost certainly be dismissed.

Do I Have to do the Field Sobriety Tests When I’m Pulled Over for DUI?

No Comments »

Nope.

Many people don’t know this, but the field sobriety tests are entirely optional. Also, field sobriety tests are designed for you to fail, and the science behind them is dubious. Is anyone really good at standing on one leg on the side of the highway and reciting the alphabet backwards? Of course not.

However, if you do choose to take the tests, everything that you say and do is later going to be used against you. Even if we assume that you complete the tests flawlessly, the officer will likely disagree. One day soon, he or she will be in court testifying about how you were swaying, slurring your speech, and generally acting like you were bombed out of your mind. Not good.

So what should you say or do? Here’s my suggestion: “Officer, I know that you are doing your job, but I respectfully decline any field sobriety tests, including the preliminary breathalyzer. I’d like to assert my right to remain silent.” Then, remain silent. If the officer believes he has probable cause to arrest you for DUI without the field sobriety tests, he will then arrest you and take you to the station.

At the station, in the vast majority of cases, it makes sense to take the blood or breath test at the police station or medical center. There are some exceptions, but that’s a topic worthy of another post.

While you probably should take the test at the police station or medical center, that doesn’t mean that you should start talking. Be cooperative and follow their directions, but don’t start talking. They’re still in the process of collecting evidence against you, and anything you say is going to come back to haunt you.

How a California Traffic Attorney Can Keep Points Off Your Record

No Comments »

I’m often asked: “I got a traffic ticket. How can you help me?”

I use a number of tactics to help clients keep points off of their driving record.

  • First, I examine the facts and the ticket and seek to have it dismissed.
  • Next, I meet with the prosecutor and police officer and seek to work out a deal with no points.
  • Next, if necessary, I take the case to trial and challenge the prosecution to prove its case.
  • Finally, I can often get the client into “second chance traffic school” if none of those options work.
By employing this multifaceted approach, I’ve had tremendous success achieving the goals of my clients and keeping their driving records clean. Far too many people simply give up and pay the fine. I say, why give up when you can fight your California traffic ticket, and win?

How Do I Fight a California Drug Possession Arrest?

1 Comment »

When a person is arrested on drug possession charges in California, more than anything, they want to know what their options are. Fortunately, in most cases, there are a substantial number of ways to fight the charges and minimize the damage, including contesting the evidence at a suppression hearing and requesting alternative punishments, such as drug treatment programs.

Even when a client is supposedly caught “red handed,” drug possession cases can be fought and won. That’s because the police and their investigators often make critical mistakes. For example, the police may have violated your Fourth Amendment rights against illegal search and seizure. Or they may have lied in order to get a warrant. Perhaps they relied on a questionable confidential informant. Another common mistake is when police arrest people for possession of drugs despite the fact that no evidence exists that the drugs belong to them.

Regardless of your situation, the important thing to remember is to relax and step back for a moment. You’re in a bind that could have life-long repercussions. The best thing you can do is to hire skilled legal counsel to aggressively contest the allegations of the police and district attorney’s office. If the police made any mistakes, we can identify them and use them to put pressure on the prosecution to drop the case or reduce the charges. We also frequently make use of the motion to suppress evidence–when successful, this frequently results in the entire case being dismissed at the suppression hearing.

If you have been arrested on drug possession charges, the police and prosecution are already building their case against you and they have substantial resources. However, with an aggressive attorney on your side, you can turn the situation around and come out clean.

Lindsay Lohan Will Be Charged With Felony Grand Theft

3 Comments »

I don’t spend a lot of time on this site discussing celebrity gossip, but the Lindsay Lohan felony grand theft case serves as an excellent excuse to discuss theft charges in California.

Felony grand theft is charged under California Penal Code 487 and is defined as “the unlawful taking of another’s property valued above $950.” If you are convicted of grand theft as a felony, the possible sentences are state prison for 16 months, two years or three years. That’s right, Ms. Lohan is facing a state prison sentence this time around.

The alleged incident occurred when Lohan left a Venice, California jewelry store by the name of Kamofie & Company with a $2,500 necklace around her neck. Lohan contends that she was told by the owner of the jewerly store that she could wear the necklace on loan. Jewerly stores sometimes allow celebrities to borrow and wear their jewerly in exchange for free publicity.  Lohan also notes that the owner of the store did not contact the police until the day after the alleged incident. The store owner has countered that she tried to contact Lohan immediately after the incident but couldn’t reach her or her people.

In order to convict Lohan, the district attorney will have to prove that she had the specific intent to permanently deprive the rightful owner of the item as she walked out the door. That may be difficult to prove.

However, like most cases, the Lindsay Lohan felony grand theft case is ripe for a plea bargain. It was one thing when the ultimate threat was 84 minutes in jail, as Lohan served in her 2007 misdemeanor cocaine use and driving under the influence case. This time Lohan is up against serious jail time. While her prior record doesn’t help her cause, it also makes it even more likely that her attorney will do everything she can to keep the felony grand theft case from going to trial.

Why You Should Fight California Red Light Tickets

2 Comments »

Cvc21453 red light traffic ticket San francisco bay area

Cities throughout California including San Francisco, Los Angeles, Orange County and Sacramento have been using Automated Enforcement Systems or Red Light Cameras at intersections for years. The red light tickets are a huge source of revenue and their benefit to society is suspect at best. If there is one good piece of new it is this: Red Light Tickets create major procedural problems for the prosecution and such tickets can be beat.

In 2009, an Appellate Court in Orange County issued a ruling on automated red light tickets that left their enforceability statewide in doubt. If you receive a red light traffic ticket, don’t just give up. For less than the cost of your fine, you can hire an attorney to handle the case for you.

Instead, when most people get a red light ticket, first they get angry, and then they give up. That’s a big mistake. A conviction in California for a violation of CVC 21453 for running a red light includes:

  • A fine of over $400
  • One point against your license
  • A record of the ticket on your DMV report
  • An increase in your insurance premiums

However, an attorney can often get a red light ticket dismissed, or beat it at trial. That means no points on your license, no record of the citation, no traffic school, and no increase in insurance premiums. On top of that, your attorney can make a court appearance for you. That means you don’t have to miss work and wait in line for traffic court all day.

When you hire an attorney to handle a ticket, you are paying for the peace of mind of knowing that you are getting the best deal possible. A prosecutor will often give a deal to an attorney that he would not give to a person that is representing themselves. Like most areas of the law, you absolutely have the right to handle the matter yourself. However, in most cases, you are wise to seek the assistance of someone who has handled such cases many times before.