Your Fourth Amendment Rights and Probable Cause

No Comments »

Under the Fourth Amendment, the police can’t search you or seize your property without probable cause. Probable cause is commonly defined as a reasonable belief that a person has committed a crime.

Probable cause typically falls into four categories: observation, expertise, information and circumstantial evidence. Police can look at the totality of the circumstances in determining whether they have probable cause. For example, it is perfectly legal to possess plastic baggies, a digital scale, large sums of cash and multiple cell phones. However, if you are pulled over for a valid traffic stop, such as a suspected DUI, and police see all of these items in your vehicle, they could determine that they have probable cause for a search, because these items are indicative of drug trafficking.

You can unwittingly provide the police with probable cause against you. Acting nervous, giving evasive answers or conflicting statements can trigger probable cause when combined with other evidence. The best thing to do is to politely but assertively  tell the police officer that you do not consent to a search and that you would like to speak with an attorney. In addition, tell him that you assert your right to remain silent and will not answer any questions without your attorney present.

Under the Fourth Amendment, these are magic words that cut off the police officers right to question you. Make no mistake, if you are in a situation where a police officer is asking you questions, you are a suspect and you are under investigation. Do not make the incredibly common mistake of incriminating yourself!

Drug Arrests Are Not All Equal

No Comments »

California is known for a liberal policy on drugs and drug possession, but that is not always the case. Many drug possession cases are charged as felonies. And when it comes to selling, growing, manufacturing or transporting drugs, the penalties are massive.

Fortunately, under Health & Safety Code 11350, drug diversion is an option for many cases that involve only drug possession.

In cases involving the alleged sale of drugs, much of the case will hinge on the question of whether the prosecution can show “intent to sell,” which is difficult to prove, absent a sting operation. When a suspect is arrested, California police look for evidence of intent to sell. Such evidence might include:

  • Relatively large quantity of drug(s)
  • Large amounts of cash
  • Weapons
  • Plastic baggies or other separate containers
  • Multiple cellular phones
  • Text messages
  • Scales
  • Precursor materials
  • Lab equipment
  • Fertilizer, pots, soil

This evidence can be aggressively challenged. After a thorough investigation, we often find that California police:

  • make mistakes, exaggerate or lie in their police reports
  • make arrests despite lacking solid evidence
  • violate suspects Constitution right to be protected from illegal searches and seizures
  • obtain warrants based on faulty or trumped up evidence
  • violate California law against entrapment
  • make use of “informants” of dubious reliability
The key in drug cases is to chop away at the evidence and assumptions one by one. There is much that can be done to get your case dismissed. For example, often it turns out that the police illegally searched you. When that’s the case, your attorney can make a suppression motion and ask the court to show out the illegally obtained evidence. If the judge agrees, your case will likely be thrown out thanks to the motion to suppress.

Top Complaint Lawyers Receive: Attorney-Client Communication

No Comments »

What bothers clients more than anything? Not keeping them in the loop. From a client’s point of view, no amount of expertise or legal talent outweighs their need to be informed. A major part of providing strong assistance of counsel is providing clear communication. In fact, frequent and clear attorney-client communication is crucial to running a successful law practice.

Lack of attorney-client communication is the most common complaint made against lawyers. There is no good reason to let this happen. There are more options than ever before allowing attorneys to keep in touch with their clients. Phone. E-mail. Text messaging. Fax. Snail mail and much more.

Yes, clients want to win their cases, that’s a given. But while they may understand that not every case can be won, they won’t accept that their matter doesn’t deserve your attention. If you fail to maintain the proper amount of attorney-client communication, clients may assume that you aren’t actually doing anything at all.

So what are some good ways to keep clients in the loop?

  • Write case memos and send them to clients as their case progresses
  • Notify clients when adding a court date to your calendar, so they can add it to theirs
  • Promptly return phone calls, e-mails and other electronic communication
  • Scan or copy case files, and share them with the client
  • Consider setting up a digital file system that allows clients to access their file and review it

Taking a few simple steps to keep your client engaged can make a massive difference in your practice. Not only will you have happier clients, but they will be more likely to bring facts to your attention that will help you win the case.

Why Assistance of Counsel is So Important

1 Comment »

According to the Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution:

“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.” (Sixth Amendment ratified December 15, 1791.)

The founding fathers believed that it was so important for everyone accused of a crime to have assistance of counsel, that they actually included it in the Sixth Amendment. The reason for that is that we have an adversarial system. The adversarial system is a legal system where represent parties represented by separate advocates who argue their positions before an impartial jury or judge, who are asked to determine the truth of the case based on the facts, law and reason. The adversarial system depends upon both sides having a competent attorney arguing on their behalf.

This means that the prosecution on the other side will be fighting as hard as they can to make sure that you receive the maximum penalty for any crime that you are accused of committing. However, with a strong advocate on your side, you will have someone to challenge the prosecution and make sure that justice is served in your case. By challenging the prosecutions position, you may be able to get your case dismissed, work out a favorable plea bargain, or be acquitted at trial.

What is a Motion to Suppress?

No Comments »

A police officer cannot arrest you, search you or your property, or seize your property unless he has probable cause to do so. Probable cause is generally defined as “facts or evidence that would make a reasonable person believe that a crime or wrongdoing has been, is being, or will be committed.”

A suppression motion is a legal tactic used in criminal defense cases that generally will question whether the arresting officer had probable cause to make a traffic stop or an arrest and seize evidence against you. The suppression hearing is an opportunity for both sides to argue their positions on the motion to suppress to the judge. The judge will consider both the argument of the distract attorney, as well as the defense attorney, and ultimately make a decision as to whether the evidence in the case should be excluded.

If after analyzing the police report and other evidence obtained by our private investigator in preparation for your case, we determine that the police illegally obtained evidence against you, we will file a motion to suppress the evidence, known in California as a 1538.5 motion. The court will then schedule a suppression hearing for your case.

At the suppression hearing, we will contend that the judge must dismiss the evidence against you as a penalty for the police violating your constitutional rights. For a motion to suppress to be granted by the judge, we must prove that the search and/or seizure was illegal by a preponderance of the evidence. If the suppression motion is successful, the prosecution will be left with no evidence against you, and your case will almost certainly be dismissed.

California Red Light Camera Tickets: The Facts

No Comments »

No one likes getting a traffic ticket. Not surprisingly, California red light camera tickets remain extremely unpopular. And for good reason.

A motorist that runs a red light can present a real danger to other drivers and pedestrians. However, red light cameras do little to prevent such dangers. In fact, red light camera tickets actually increase accidents at intersections where they are deployed. That’s not all, according to an interview posted at Reason.com:

  • Rolling right turns account for 75 percent of the tickets and the citations issued by red light camera.
  • Accidents rarely occur from rolling right turns at red lights.
  • Most of the remaining tickets are issued to drivers that enter the intersection a split second after the end of a yellow light. Such technical violations rarely result in accidents or present a real danger.
  • The real danger comes from blatant red light runners who blow through an intersection long after the light has already turned green from the cross traffic. Such drivers are unlikely to be deterred by the presence of a red light camera.
So if you get a red light camera ticket, should you fight it? Almost certainly, yes. Here’s why:
  1. Tickets are expensive. A red light ticket costs nearly $500.
  2. Tickets put points on your record, which can result in a suspended license and an increase in your insurance premiums.
  3. Tickets are beatable. A red light camera ticket has major constitutional and evidentiary issues for the prosecution. Namely, the evidence is hearsay and often cannot be properly authenticated. That means that a skilled traffic attorney may be able to get your ticket dismissed.
It’s always wise to drive in a safe and courteous manner. That said, it isn’t fair for otherwise law abiding motorists to face such serious consequences for a technical violation that doesn’t put anyone in danger. If you receive a red light camera ticket, I encourage you to fight your ticket.

Samantha Ronson Needs a California DUI Defense Attorney

No Comments »

I’ve said before that I don’t spend a lot of time on this site discussing celebrity gossip, but apparently that is not the case, as I’m about to talk about celebrities again. The fact is, celebrities like Lindsay Lohan and Paris Hilton make for great criminal law stories, and people love to read about them.

Case in point, Samantha Ronson, the DJ who dated actress Lindsay Lohan from 2008 to 2009, who was arrested at 10:30 am on August 2nd for DUI. According to police, her blood alcohol level was found to be above .08. Ronson was pulled over doing 90 mph in a 70 and hauled off to San Bernardino County Jail after failing field sobriety tests. Ronson was cooperative enough to make it out of jail by 6 pm, but now she faces a fine of $1,000 and up to 6 months in jail. No doubt she will be lawyering up with a California criminal defense lawyer for her September 23rd hearing!

So how do you know when you need a California DUI lawyer?

  • You are arrested for DUI
  • You were in a car accident caused as a result of your drinking
  • You are in an accident where someone was injured or killed

You should know that you are facing especially serious consequences if :

  • Your BAC was over double the state limit
  • You are facing other charges in addition to the DUI
  • You have one or more other DUIs on your record.

A California criminal defense attorney can help you understand the charges you are facing and aggressively counter them in order to minimize the damage and keep you out of jail.

Do I Have to do the Field Sobriety Tests When I’m Pulled Over for DUI?

No Comments »

Nope.

Many people don’t know this, but the field sobriety tests are entirely optional. Also, field sobriety tests are designed for you to fail, and the science behind them is dubious. Is anyone really good at standing on one leg on the side of the highway and reciting the alphabet backwards? Of course not.

However, if you do choose to take the tests, everything that you say and do is later going to be used against you. Even if we assume that you complete the tests flawlessly, the officer will likely disagree. One day soon, he or she will be in court testifying about how you were swaying, slurring your speech, and generally acting like you were bombed out of your mind. Not good.

So what should you say or do? Here’s my suggestion: “Officer, I know that you are doing your job, but I respectfully decline any field sobriety tests, including the preliminary breathalyzer. I’d like to assert my right to remain silent.” Then, remain silent. If the officer believes he has probable cause to arrest you for DUI without the field sobriety tests, he will then arrest you and take you to the station.

At the station, in the vast majority of cases, it makes sense to take the blood or breath test at the police station or medical center. There are some exceptions, but that’s a topic worthy of another post.

While you probably should take the test at the police station or medical center, that doesn’t mean that you should start talking. Be cooperative and follow their directions, but don’t start talking. They’re still in the process of collecting evidence against you, and anything you say is going to come back to haunt you.

How a California Traffic Attorney Can Keep Points Off Your Record

No Comments »

I’m often asked: “I got a traffic ticket. How can you help me?”

I use a number of tactics to help clients keep points off of their driving record.

  • First, I examine the facts and the ticket and seek to have it dismissed.
  • Next, I meet with the prosecutor and police officer and seek to work out a deal with no points.
  • Next, if necessary, I take the case to trial and challenge the prosecution to prove its case.
  • Finally, I can often get the client into “second chance traffic school” if none of those options work.
By employing this multifaceted approach, I’ve had tremendous success achieving the goals of my clients and keeping their driving records clean. Far too many people simply give up and pay the fine. I say, why give up when you can fight your California traffic ticket, and win?

Palo Alto Reviewing Hundreds of DUIs Due to Faulty Breathalyzers

2 Comments »

Ah, the Breathalyzer machine. I’ve discussed Breathalyzers here before. Breathalyzer manufacturers, police officers and district attorneys would love for everyone to believe that Breathalyzers are accurate, infallible machines. But of course they are not. And when your life and liberty are on the line after a DUI arrest involving a breath test, the least the prosecution can do is offer evidence that is scientifically accurate. But frequently, that is not the case, as a recent breath test investigation in Palo Alto uncovered:

“Police used the faulty Alco-Sensor V devices from the end of February through mid-December, said police Lt. Sandra Brown. The Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office announced Tuesday there were problems with the devices, which also were used in San Jose,” Mercury News reports. “We won’t know for sure until we’ve reviewed all these cases,” said Supervising Deputy District Attorney James Gibbons-Shapiro.

Problems were first discovered with the Breathalyzers in April 2010. ”I think it was a training issue,” Brown said, Mercury News reports. ”An officer was showing a new officer the (Breathalyzers) and got a reading.”

Prosecutors will review the Palo Alto and San Jose breath test cases within a month. Defense attorneys are calling on the district attorney’s office to dismiss any Palo Alto DUI cases that relied on the Alco-Sensor V Breathalyzer results.

Palo Alto’s independent police auditor, Michael Gennaco, said he didn’t see any “evidence that there was misconduct in the traditional sense,” but the department can still learn from the experience. ”The immediate lesson is you’ve got to check your equipment, you’ve got to check it frequently,” Gennaco said.

Another lesson is that if you’ve been arrested for DUI, make sure that you speak with a DUI defense attorney. Far too many people simply give up…a big mistake.